<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Mathematics and Computation</title>
	<link>http://math.andrej.com</link>
	<description>Mathematics for computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 16:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2-beta2-18055" -->

	<item>
		<title>A puzzle about typing</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While making a comment on Stackoverflow I noticed something: suppose we have a term in the $\lambda$-calculus in which no abstracted variable is used more than once. For example, $\lambda a b c . (a b) (\lambda d. d c)$ is such a term, but $\lambda f . f (\lambda x . x x)$ is not because [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2012/01/20/a-puzzle-about-typing/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On the Bourbaki-Witt Principle in Toposes</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine.</p>
<p>Abstract: The Bourbaki-Witt principle states that any progressive map on a chain-complete poset has a fixed point above every point. It is provable classically, but not intuitionistically. We study this and related principles in an intuitionistic setting. Among other things, we show that Bourbaki-Witt fails exactly when the trichotomous ordinals form a set, but does not [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2012/01/04/on-the-bourbaki-witt-principle-in-toposes/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>HoTT Equivalences</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>On December 6th 2011 I gave a talk about homotopy equivalences in the context of homotopy type theory at our seminar for foundations of mathematics and theoretical computer science. I discuss the differences and relations between isomorphism (in the sense of type theory), an adjoint equivalence, and a homotopy equivalence. Even though the talk itself was [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2011/12/07/hott-equivalences/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>How to make the &#8220;impossible&#8221; functionals run even faster</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A talk given at &#8220;Mathematics, Algorithms and Proofs 2011&#8243; at the Lorentz Center in Leiden, the Netherlands. I explain how to use computational effects to speed up Martin Escardo&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2011/12/06/how-to-make-the-impossible-functionals-run-even-faster/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Embedding the Baire space into natural numbers</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>A talk given at &#8220;Computation with Infinite Data: Logical and Topological Foundations&#8221; Dagstuhl seminar 11411. I describe a realizability model based on infinite-time Turing machines in which it is possible to embed the Baire space (infinite sequences of numbers) into the space of numbers.</p>
<p>Also see the post Constructive gem: an injection from Baire space to natural [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2011/12/06/embedding-the-baire-space-into-natural-numbers/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

