<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miniprolog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://math.andrej.com/2009/01/16/miniprolog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://math.andrej.com/2009/01/16/miniprolog/</link>
	<description>Mathematics for computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 09:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: babelfish007</title>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2009/01/16/miniprolog/comment-page-1/#comment-11211</link>
		<dc:creator>babelfish007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math.andrej.com/?p=156#comment-11211</guid>
		<description>What do you think about adapting miniprolog to work within Ocaml? It would be nice to be able to integrate functional and logic programming, while maintaining the basic infrastructure (i.e., arithmetic, graphics, iteration) of the Ocaml language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about adapting miniprolog to work within Ocaml? It would be nice to be able to integrate functional and logic programming, while maintaining the basic infrastructure (i.e., arithmetic, graphics, iteration) of the Ocaml language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
