<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dedekind Reals in Abstract Stone Duality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://math.andrej.com/2005/07/27/the-dedekind-reals-in-abstract-stone-duality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://math.andrej.com/2005/07/27/the-dedekind-reals-in-abstract-stone-duality/</link>
	<description>Mathematics for computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2-beta2-18055</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrej Bauer</title>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2005/07/27/the-dedekind-reals-in-abstract-stone-duality/comment-page-1/#comment-14247</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrej Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 04:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math.andrej.com/?p=26#comment-14247</guid>
		<description>@Paul: you just use a lot of buzzwords, and what you wrote could be written as a comment to any blog post about spacetime. So sorry, I don&#039;t have a real reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul: you just use a lot of buzzwords, and what you wrote could be written as a comment to any blog post about spacetime. So sorry, I don&#8217;t have a real reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buecking, Paul</title>
		<link>http://math.andrej.com/2005/07/27/the-dedekind-reals-in-abstract-stone-duality/comment-page-1/#comment-14145</link>
		<dc:creator>Buecking, Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://math.andrej.com/?p=26#comment-14145</guid>
		<description>Dear Andrej,
Comes very close to my intuition of spacetime. This is considered to be a dual manifestatin of a finite metaphysical logical space defined by a simple mathematical object known sinc many decades. A perfect correlation between the internal logic, geomatrically visualized by this mathematical object, and the realization of Nature on the fundamental scale is found. The Everything is found to be the dual physical manifestation of an a priori existing logical space - like thought and its realization. A logical space does not have a fabric, is somehow a continuum that could get a logical structure when expressing some context.

That is why also spacetime, being its duality, should not have a fabric/ metric. In  connection with a new orbifold-substructured dynamic superstring concept it was found that these dynamic superstring entities holographically express themselves in the surrounding spacetime continuum.
This implies that spacetime gets a fabric / structure locally by the events that take place in it. The spacetime continuum does not a priori have a fabric, but gets it by events. The kind of fabric is geometrically defined according to what is expressed - the particle, gravity, fields ....

That is why I am so much interested. But my is pure intuition.
I would be pleased to get a reply

       Sincerely Paul 

 paul_buecking@gmx.de</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Andrej,<br />
Comes very close to my intuition of spacetime. This is considered to be a dual manifestatin of a finite metaphysical logical space defined by a simple mathematical object known sinc many decades. A perfect correlation between the internal logic, geomatrically visualized by this mathematical object, and the realization of Nature on the fundamental scale is found. The Everything is found to be the dual physical manifestation of an a priori existing logical space &#8211; like thought and its realization. A logical space does not have a fabric, is somehow a continuum that could get a logical structure when expressing some context.</p>
<p>That is why also spacetime, being its duality, should not have a fabric/ metric. In  connection with a new orbifold-substructured dynamic superstring concept it was found that these dynamic superstring entities holographically express themselves in the surrounding spacetime continuum.<br />
This implies that spacetime gets a fabric / structure locally by the events that take place in it. The spacetime continuum does not a priori have a fabric, but gets it by events. The kind of fabric is geometrically defined according to what is expressed &#8211; the particle, gravity, fields &#8230;.</p>
<p>That is why I am so much interested. But my is pure intuition.<br />
I would be pleased to get a reply</p>
<p>       Sincerely Paul </p>
<p> <a href="mailto:paul_buecking@gmx.de">paul_buecking@gmx.de</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

